SEARCH OHR


WHAT'S NEW?

User Forum
Occupational Health News
Updated Algorithms
Training Sessions
Most Recent Tracker

FEATURES

Find a Provider
Resources
Policy Guides
Tracker Journal
MRO Self-Assessment
Protocols/Algorithms
Job Postings
 

SOFTWARE SUPPORT

SYSTOC Software
User Forum
Contact Information
Training Sessions
E-mail Questions

ABOUT OHR

Our History
Mission Statement
Business Philosophy
Employment
What Clients Say
Staff Directory
Directions & Map

EXTERNAL LINKS

Ohio Employee Health Partnership
OHROnline Meetings
OHRHelp Meetings
OHR University
Adobe Reader
 

Occupational Health News Summaries  

Court Discards Discrimination Case Decision, Accepts New Standard

[Posted 01/02/2008] A federal appellate court has thrown out its earlier ruling in a discrimination case against the United Parcel Service (UPS) and set out a standard for how employers can defend themselves against allegations of discrimination against the disabled.

Sitting as a group, the 15-member 9th Circuit Court of Appeals changed its mind from its first ruling in the case in October 2006 involving hearing-impaired UPS drivers and whether the package delivery company discriminated against them for positions as package car drivers. In their new decision, the court threw out an injunction barring certain tests for the driver positions and sent the case back to Senior US District Judge Thelton E. Henderson of the US District Court for the Northern District of California for additional hearings.

The federal government requires drivers of large trucks to pass a hearing test. UPS had used the same federal standard in screening drivers for smaller trucks, which the plaintiffs said is discriminatory. The decision laid out a new defense standard for employers hit with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claims. UPS is entitled to use, as some evidence of its business necessity defense, the fact that it relied on a government safety standard, Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeon wrote for the court, even where the standard is not applicable to the category of conduct at issue.

Related Links:
9th Circuit Court Opinion
Earlier News Article from systoc.com (10/14/05)

Return to News Summary Page:
Occupational Health News Summaries

 

 

   

Home | Contact Information | E-mail Us