SEARCH OHR


WHAT'S NEW?

User Forum
Occupational Health News
Updated Algorithms
Training Sessions
Most Recent Tracker

FEATURES

Find a Provider
Resources
Policy Guides
Tracker Journal
MRO Self-Assessment
Protocols/Algorithms
Job Postings
 

SOFTWARE SUPPORT

SYSTOC Software
User Forum
Contact Information
Training Sessions
E-mail Questions

ABOUT OHR

Our History
Mission Statement
Business Philosophy
Employment
What Clients Say
Staff Directory
Directions & Map

EXTERNAL LINKS

Ohio Employee Health Partnership
OHROnline Meetings
OHRHelp Meetings
OHR University
Adobe Reader
 

Occupational Health News Summaries  

International Coalition Calls for Strong Nanotechnology Oversight

[Posted 8/29/07] A broad international coalition of consumer, public health, environmental, labor, and civil society organizations spanning six continents has released a document entitled “Principles for the Oversight of Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials,” which calls for strong, comprehensive oversight of the new technology and its products. The document identifies eight fundamental principles that coalition members believe will provide the foundation for adequate and effective oversight. These are:

1. A Precautionary Foundation: Product manufacturers and distributors must bear the burden of proof to demonstrate the safety of their products: if no independent health and safety data review, then no market approval.

2. Mandatory Nano-specific Regulations: Nanomaterials should be classified as new substances and subject to nano-specific oversight. Voluntary initiatives are not sufficient.

3. Health and Safety of the Public and Workers: The prevention of exposure to nanomaterials that have not been proven safe must be undertaken to protect the public and workers.

4. Environmental Protection: A full lifecycle analysis of environmental impacts must be completed prior to commercialization.

5. Transparency: All nano-products must be labeled and safety data made publicly available.

6. Public Participation: There must be open, meaningful, and full public participation at every level.

7. Inclusion of Broader Impacts: Nanotechnology’s wide-ranging effects, including ethical and social impacts, must be considered.

8. Manufacturer Liability: Nano-industries must be liable for any undesirable consequences from the use of their products.

Hundreds of consumer products incorporating nanomaterials are currently on the market, including cosmetics, sunscreens, sporting goods, clothing, electronics, baby and infant products, and food and food packaging, even though evidence indicates that current nanomaterials may pose significant health, safety, and environmental hazards. In addition, the profound social, economic, and ethical challenges posed by nano-scale technologies have yet to be addressed.

According to Beth Burrows of the Edmonds Institute, a public interest organization dedicated to education about environment, technology, and intellectual property rights, “As new technologies emerge we need to ensure new materials and their applications are benign and contribute to a healthy and socially just world. Given our past mistakes with ‘wonder technologies’ like pesticides, asbestos, and ozone depleting chemicals, the rapid commercialization of nanomaterials without full testing or oversight is shocking. It is no surprise that the public of the 21st century is demanding more accountability.”

The complete document is available at numerous endorsing organizations websites, including www.icta.org. Organizations can endorse the principles by emailing gkimbrell@icta.org.

Return to News Summary Page:
Occupational Health News Summaries

 

 

   

Home | Contact Information | E-mail Us