SEARCH OHR


WHAT'S NEW?

User Forum
Health-related News
Training Sessions
Most Recent Tracker

FEATURES

Find a Provider
Resources
Free Guides
Tracker Journal
Protocols/Algorithms
Job Postings
 

SOFTWARE SUPPORT

SYSTOC Software
User Forum
Contact Information
Training Sessions
E-mail Questions

ABOUT OHR

Our History
Mission Statement
Business Philosophy
Employment
What Clients Say
Staff Directory
Directions & Map

EXTERNAL LINKS

Ohio Employee Health Partnership
OHROnline Meetings
OHRHelp Meetings
OHR University
Microsoft Live Meeting
Adobe Reader
 

Tracker Winter 2003

William L. Newkirk, MD, FACPM

REGULATORY UPDATE
OSHA’s New Rule for Recording Hearing Loss
By William L. Newkirk, MD, FACPM

Deadline is Approaching
Three Comparisons
The Reasons Behind The Changes

Deadline is Approaching

On July 1, 2002 OSHA published the Final Rule on Recording Hearing Loss. This is a revision of the hearing loss provisions of the Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Requirements published January 19, 2001. OSHA’s new rule is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2003.

If your clinic performs audiometric testing for corporate clients that are subject to federal OSHA regulations, you will need to identify OSHA-reportable test results using the new methodology.

Here is the change: Before January 1, 2003, companies must report to OSHA those workers who experience a hearing loss that averages 25 decibels (dB) at 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz (Hz), regardless of the present level of the employee’s hearing. Starting January 1, 2003, companies will need to report to OSHA those workers who experience an average hearing loss of 10 dB at 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz and whose hearing level after the change averages 25 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz.

Three Comparisons

To see how the new rules compare to the old, let’s look at three case studies:

CASE 1

Frequency Baseline New Audiogram Difference
(Hz) (dB) (dB) (dB)
2000 10 35 25
3000 10 35 25
4000 10 35 25
Average 10 35 25

In Case 1 the difference between the audiograms averages 25 dB and the new audiogram averages 35 dB. This hearing loss would be reportable to OSHA under both the old and new rules.

In Case 2 the difference between the audiograms averages 10 dB and the new audiogram averages 20 dB. This audiogram would not be reportable to OSHA under either the old or new rules.

CASE 2

Frequency Baseline New Audiogram Difference
(Hz) (dB) (dB) (dB)
2000 10 15 5
3000 10 25 15
4000 10 20 10
Average 10 20 10

In the final example (Case 3), the difference between the audiograms averages 10 dB and the new audiogram averages 30 dB. This audiogram would not be reportable to OSHA under the old rules, but is reportable under the new rules because it meets the new standard of average change of 10 dB or greater and average hearing level after the change is 25 dB or more.

CASE 3

Frequency Baseline New Audiogram Difference
(Hz) (dB) (dB) (dB)
2000 20 30 10
3000 15 35 20
4000 25 25 0
Average 20 30 10

[
top]

The Reasons Behind the Changes

Why did OSHA make the change? Several reasons-here are two:
To understand the first, we need to review some basic audiology. When we discuss hearing, we use the measure of decibels, named after the great scientist Alexander Graham Bell. A decibel is generally the level of just noticeable difference in hearing in the normal human ear. As a rule, we cannot tell the difference between two sounds less than a decibel apart.

The decibel scale is logarithmic. Since you may not remember logarithms very well from high school, look at the table on the next page. In that table, we show how a particular change in decibels relates to the underlying change in sound intensity.

TABLE 1
Change in Decibels Factor Change in Sound Intensity
10 10
20 100
25 316
30 1,000
40 10,000
50 100,000
60 1,000,000

Look at the difference between the 10 dB and 25 dB changes in Table 1. A change of 10 decibels reflects a change in sound intensity of 10 times; a change of 25 dB is a change of 316 times. Big difference!

OSHA concluded it was too big. So OSHA adopted a narrower range.

A second reason for the change is that the old 25 dB OSHA reporting standard created a mess. OSHA wants the employee notified when a standard threshold shift (STS) has occurred. An STS is defined as an average change at 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz of 10 dB or more. Using 25 dB as the OSHA reportable cutoff meant that programs had to keep two sets of baseline audiograms-one for the 10 dB shift that needed to be reported to the employee and one for the 25 dB shift that needed to be reported to OSHA. The new requirement simplifies reporting considerably because a single baseline can be used for both employee and OSHA reporting.

OSHA estimates 105,779 additional cases of occupational hearing loss will be captured by this rule change.

If you are using software to manage audiology reporting, be sure to obtain an updated version of your reports prior to the January 1, 2003 deadline.

[
top]

[Return to Winter 2002-2003 main page]

About the author:
WILLIAM L. NEWKIRK  is a board-certified occupational medicine specialist. He is Director of Occupational Medicine at Redington-Fairview General Hospital in Skowhegan, Maine, and Director of Research and founder of Occupational Health Research. You may reach Dr. Newkirk at bill.newkirk@systoc.com.
 

Home | Contact Information | E-mail Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement