Final Regulations on HIPAA
Two HIPAA final regulations were published in the
February 20th Federal Register regarding Security
Standards and modifications of the Transaction
Standards.
Final privacy standards have already been adopted by
the Department of Health and Human Services and take
effect April 14th.
The Security Standards require all covered entities
to implement administrative, physical, and technological
safeguards to protect electronic health information.
These Security Standards take effect April 21, 2005 for
all covered entities (except small health plans, which
have an additional year to comply).
The Transactions Standards cover electronic
healthcare transactions and code sets. All covered
entities must begin software and systems testing by
April 16th.
View these rules at:
www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa2/default.asp.
Sign up for HIPAA e-mail alerts at:
aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/lsnotify.htm.
Workplace Illnesses and Injuries Hit Record Low in
2001
On December 19, 2002 United States Secretary of Labor
Elaine L. Chao announced that the 2001 workplace injury
and illness rates had hit a record low.
"Today’s announcement of continued decline in
workplace injuries and illnesses is good news for
America’s working men and women, their families, and
their employers," said Secretary of Labor Chao.
"Workplace injuries and illnesses have dropped for the
ninth consecutive year, reaching an all-time low.
Construction injuries are down. And there has been a 10%
reduction in repeated trauma injuries, such as carpal
tunnel syndrome and other musculoskeletal disorders."
The decline affected both the rate and the number of
injuries. The number of injuries and illnesses declined
from 5,650,100 in 2000 to 5,215,600 in 2001. This
represents a 7.69% decline, dramatically larger than in
the preceding years (see Figure 1).

The injury and illness rate also declined to 5.8
injuries and illnesses per 100 workers. This rate
continues its dramatic decline (see Figure 2).

For additional information, visit
www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm.
[Comment: Bureau of Labor Statistics data on Illness
and Injuries are always one year behind. So they show us
where we’ve been. These 2001 figures confirm what most
occupational medicine observers have seen: injury rates
are down dramatically and, as a result, the occupational
medicine marketplace is contracting. The declines result
from a number of factors: a change in industrial mix
with a loss of manufacturing jobs, a weak economy,
enhanced safety efforts and changes in workers
compensation rules. – William L. Newkirk, MD, FACPM (wln)]
[top]
Clarification of New OSHA Hearing Requirements
On January 1, 2003 occupational health programs
around the country began switching their analyses of
audiograms for OSHA hearing conservation programs. On
July 1, 2002 OSHA had published OSHA’s Final Rule on
Recording Hearing Loss in the Federal Register. This is
a revision of the hearing loss provisions of the
Occupational Injury and Illness Recording provisions of
the Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and
Reporting Requirements rule published January 19, 2001.
On December 11, 2002 OSHA clarified three matters in
relation to recording occupational hearing loss.
The preamble to the final rule stated that employers
in the shipbuilding industries are not covered by OSHA’s
noise standard §1910.95 and are therefore not required
to perform audiometric tests.
This statement was an error. OSHA
Directive STD 0.2 Identification of General Industry
Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910) Applicable to
Shipyard Work specifically states that employers in the
shipbuilding industry that are covered by the 29 CFR
Part 1915 Standards are required to comply with a number
of 29 CFR Part 1910 standards, including the §1910.95
requirements for occupational noise.
The second issue involves the computation of a
Standard Threshold Shift (STS), which is one part of the
two-part recording criteria recently published (67 Fr
44037-44048). OSHA’s former recording criteria required
the employer to track separate baselines for recording
and hearing conservation purposes. However, the new Part
1904 hearing loss recording system relies on the
existing 1910.95 calculations, and
separate baselines will no longer be required.
In short, if an employee’s audiogram reveals that the
employee has experienced a work-related STS in hearing
in one or both ears, and the employee’s total hearing
level is 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero
(averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s)
as the STS, you must record the case on the OSHA 300
Log.
Make sure you are in compliance:
January 1, 2003: new OSHA hearing regulations took
effect.
January 1, 2004: OSHA 300 log will change to have a
special column for recording hearing loss.
OSHA has noted concern among employers because the
application of the new two-part test in the new §1904.10
recording criteria will result in an increase in
recorded hearing loss cases. As noted in the July 1,
2002 rulemaking, the new criteria will capture more
hearing loss cases. Employers will experience an
increase in recorded hearing loss cases in 2003 and
future years. Caution must be used when comparing the
2003 and future data to prior years, when the 25 dB
criteria for recordkeeping was used. OSHA recognizes
this increase, and will take the changes in the
recordkeeping rule into account when evaluating an
employer’s injury and illness experience.
On additional area that has confused some programs is
that OSHA has delayed, until January 1, 2004, a
modification of the OSHA 300 log that requires employers
to check a hearing loss column to record work-related
cases of hearing loss. Although the new column takes
effect in 2004, the new criteria for determine hearing
loss takes effect on January 1, 2003.
For additional information:
www.osha.gov
www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/clarifications-recordkeeping.html
www.systoc.com/outcomes_protocols/hearing.htm
www.systoc.com/Tracker/Winter02/TrackerArticles/OSHA.asp
[Comment: This is not a minor change for programs
that manage hearing conservation programs. Make sure
your methodology for interpreting audiograms is
up-to-date. – wln]