|
Archeological studies reveal
tuberculosis has plagued human history in excess of
5,000 years.1,2 Pre-dynastic Egyptian graves show
evidence of the disease through DNA testing as well as
spinal deformities in mummies. Pre-Columbian Peruvian
mummies 900 years old also indicate the existence of TB
in that society.
With the close of the Middle Ages in
Europe, clinical study of TB resulted in a growing
volume of information regarding tuberculosis, and
ultimately, identification of the tuberculosis bacillus
in 1882 by Robert Koch. But only in the 1940’s did
antibiotic treatment become available, replacing earlier
therapy largely centered on isolation and symptomatic
management.
Nevertheless, TB remains a significant
health hazard, not merely confined to the weak, the
poor, and disenfranchised.3 In fact, TB constitutes a
challenge to healthcare workers, particularly
occupational health clinics that care for employees
working in schools, hospitals, other medical clinics,
and chronic care facilities where TB remains endemic.
Transmission and Pathogenesis
Tuberculosis is a communicable disease
caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the
tubercle bacillus. The organism is spread from an
individual with infectious TB via tiny airborne
particles through inhalation of the droplets. If the
inhaled bacilli reach the pulmonary alveoli, they are
ingested by macrophages and the organism multiplies.
The TB recipient is considered to have
TB infection. Usually the immune system contains the
bacilli and the individual remains asymptomatic and is
not contagious, although a TB skin test result will be
positive.4 If, however, the immune system is not able to
control the infection, TB disease occurs, and clinical
symptoms and physical findings are present. Skin testing
is positive and transmission of the disease may follow.
Approximately 10% of those who contract
TB infection in the United States will develop TB
disease. At-risk individuals include those who are
immunosuppressed, IV drug users, persons with HIV, close
contacts of patients with TB disease, and healthcare
workers exposed to patients with TB disease.
Thus, the challenge is to identify those
individuals, referred to as "converters," whose skin
test becomes positive due to exposure to TB bacteria,
particularly before they develop active disease and
transmit the organism to others.
Occupational Healthcare Providers
Occupational healthcare providers
deliver an important and necessary service regarding TB
testing and management. The Occ Med clinic often
provides surveillance for other healthcare workers
exposed to patients either with TB or at high risk.
Healthcare workers are presumed to be at
elevated risk of developing TB disease compared to the
population at large.5 For that reason, a variety of
federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines
6,7,8,9 mandate or describe surveillance and periodic
testing protocols. Individuals at risk include physician
and nursing staff, EMTs and ambulance personnel,
teachers, and others. In general, healthcare workers,
particularly those in high-risk positions, are required
to be tested annually. Others, such as teachers in
private or parochial elementary or secondary schools in
California, may be tested at least every four
years.10,11
[top]
TB Skin Testing
The Mantoux tuberculin skin test is the
standard method of identifying persons infected with
M. tuberculosis. The test is performed by a trained
and experienced healthcare worker who carefully injects
0.1 ml of purified protein derivative (PPD) tuberculin
containing five tuberculin units intradermally into the
volar surface of the forearm. The injection is made with
a disposable syringe oriented so that the bevel faces
upward to produce a discrete, pale elevation of the skin
six to 10 mm in diameter. This technique assures an
intradermal deposit; an injection below the dermis is
not correct procedure.
A properly-trained clinic staff person
evaluates the test reaction 48 to 72 hours later. A
positive reaction takes the form of a raised and
palpable wheal that is measured through the long
axis of the forearm; erythema does not constitute a
positive reaction. The standard for a positive reaction
varies by risk group. A 10 mm or greater reaction is
considered positive among the following:
-
employees of high-risk congregate
settings;
-
residents of high-risk congregate
settings;
-
mycobacteriology laboratory
personnel;
-
recent arrivals from high-prevalence
countries;
-
injection drug users;
-
children less than four years of
age, or children
and adolescents exposed to adults in high-risk
categories.
Among risk groups with impaired
response, a reaction of at least 5 mm is considered
positive. Individuals in this classification include:
-
HIV-positive persons;
-
recent contacts of TB cases;
-
persons with fibrotic changes on
chest x-ray consistent with old, healed TB;
-
patients with organ transplants or
other immunosuppression factors.
For all other persons with no known risk
factors, a reaction of 15 mm or greater is considered
positive.12,13,14
False positive results may arise from
nontuberculous mycobacteria or prior administration of
BCG vaccine. False negative results may arise from
anergy, which occurs with HIV infection, severe or
febrile illness, measles or other viral infections,
live-virus vaccinations, recent or overwhelming TB
disease, Hodgkin’s disease, sarcoidosis, treatment with
corticosteroids, or immunosuppressed patients.
Some individuals who were infected with
TB many years previously may have a negative reaction to
initial TB skin testing. Yet skin testing can boost
their response to tuberculin, resulting in positive
tests thereafter. On re-testing one to three weeks after
the initial TB skin test, these individuals may exhibit
a positive reaction, but it should not to be interpreted
as a new conversion. This may occur with individuals of
any age, although it is more common among older persons.
Performing two successive tests is described as two-step
testing and is appropriate, even though the initial test
was negative, if one suspects that prior TB disease or
infection occurred. The American College of Occupational
and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) offers guidelines
regarding two-step testing.
"ACOEM fully supports implementation of
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Health-Care Facilities,
1994.2,3. In particular, the College endorses the use of
individual risk assessments for each clinical facility
and its specific components, with review of the
institution’s TB-control program at appropriate
intervals, in accordance with its case experience. The
use of two-step tuberculin testing of newly hired
healthcare workers (who have no documentation of a
negative purified protein derivative (PPD) test result
in the previous 12 months) can avoid pseudoconversions
(positive tuberculin reactions due to anamnestic
responses, rather than to recent workplace
infections)."15
Treatment of Tuberculosis
The term TB converter is applied when an
individual’s test result moves from negative to positive
without any extenuating factors as outlined above to
explain it. TB treatment should be initiated as soon as
a converter is identified. Current disease management
guidelines are available from a variety of sources,
including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.16 In the Occ Med clinic, a patient with a positive skin test
should be evaluated to determine the existence of TB
disease, i.e., acute infection. Review of the patient’s
medical history and physical examination may reveal the
condition. In addition, a chest x-ray should be taken
for the clinic physician’s wet reading. If there is
clinical evidence of active infection, the patient
should be removed from his/her work place until
treatment is initiated and the infection is controlled.
In some areas, referral may be made to
the County Health Department or a local respiratory
medicine specialist. If the Occ Med clinic is familiar
and comfortable with managing patients with TB
infection, however, then no referral need be made.
Reporting is mandated by several
entities. OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1904.11 requires
recording on the OSHA 300 log.17 State regulations often
require reporting to an indigenous agency. For example,
the California Codes of Regulations specify that cases
be reported to the local health officer.18,19
[top]
SYSTOC© Resources
Occupational Health Research’s web site
at www.systoc.com provides an excellent algorithm
for busy practitioners that covers employee tuberculosis
testing.20 Note that retesting is recommended to
determine a possible booster effect (described earlier)
to identify employees that may have had TB disease in
the remote past but whose preliminary skin test result
is negative. SYSTOC software includes a tuberculosis
module that stores data from a TB monitoring program and
includes a recall function for follow up appointments
and periodic monitoring.
Summary
TB surveillance is an important
responsibility of the occupational medicine clinic.
Federal, state, and other legislative mandates require
that knowledgeable attention be given to employees at
risk of exposure to tuberculosis. Further, the clinic
can serve as a valuable resource to the employer that
may not be familiar with TB surveillance regulations,
assuring effective health monitoring as well as
enhancing client-provider relationships.
TB skin testing must be administered and
interpreted carefully and accurately. Certification of
testing staff may be required. A positive test reaction
requires medical management. If a negative result is
observed and the patient’s prior test was more than a
year prior, two-step testing should be considered.
Diagnosis of TB disease requires employer reporting on
the OSHA 300 log and may require reporting by the
provider to the local health officer. .
Footnotes
1 http://www.wits.ac.za/myco/html/h_tb.htm.
2 http://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/tbhistry.htm.
3
Palmore, Tara N., and Kent A.
Sepkowitz, MDs, "Occupational Risk of Tuberculosis Among
Healthcare Workers," Clinics in Occupational and
Environmental Medicine, W.B. Sanders Company, August
2002.
4
Ibid, p 610.
5
AIHAJ, May-June 2000, 61(3): 334-9.
6 http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb/pubs/mmwr/rr4411.pdf.
7 http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/99-143.pdf.
8 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5210a1.htm.
9 http://www.lapublichealth.org/acd/procs/b73/Part%202.pdf.
10
California Education Code 41311,
49530.5, 49531.
11
California Health and Safety Code
3381.
12 http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb/pubs/corecurr/default.htm.
13 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00038873.htm.
14 http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb/pubs/corecurr/default.htm.
15 http://www.acoem.org/guidelines/article.asp?ID=27.
16 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5211a1.htm.
17
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9642.
18
http://ccr.oal.ca.gov/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=83081&advquery=72537&infobase=ccr&record={60B9B}&softpage=Browse_Frame_Pg42&x=29
&y=16&zz=.
19 http://lapublichealth.org/tb/tbcmr.htm.
20 http://www.systoc.com/outcomes_protocols/Tuberculosis%20Employee%20Testing.htm.
[top]
[Return to Autumn
2003 main page]
Articles in the Tracker may be printed and/or
photocopied for personal use. To reprint an article in
print or on-line media, include the following in the
reproduced copy: "This article originally appeared in
the Occupational Health Tracker, Vol.6, No.3.
Reprinted with permission of Occupational Health
Research, www.systoc.com."
|