|
|
 |
DIMENSIONS OF CARE
Medical Surveillance of Pesticide Workers
by Kirby Griffin, MD |
|
|
Restrictions
on the use of persistent organochlorine pesticides have
resulted in an increase in the use of the
organophosphate pesticides. The organophosphates are
less persistent in the environment but have a greater
acute toxicity. I would like to discuss issues of
medical and biologic monitoring for workers with
potential exposure to organophosphate pesticides. I will
avoid discussion of clinical manifestations and the
treatment of organophosphate poisoning [which was
covered in Dr. Steven Schumann’s article in Volume 5,
Number 4 of the Tracker—Ed.], and focus on medical
surveillance of pesticide workers.
Background
Organophosphates are inhibitors of cholinesterase.
Cholinesterase is the enzyme that causes the metabolism
of acetylcholine. Acetylcholine is the neurotransmitter
at parasympathetic and myoneural junctions, in autonomic
ganglia, and in the brain. Poisoning from
organophosphates results when the inhibition of
cholinesterase leads to an accumulation of acetylcholine
at the nerve synapses, causing overstimulation. If the
process continues, there is eventual paralysis of neural
transmission. Workers who apply and mix pesticides are
at risk of systemic poisoning. Agricultural workers are
also at risk from exposure to these pesticides in the
field. Both acute and chronic poisoning may occur.
Biological monitoring is useful in assessing the
effectiveness of personal protective equipment,
including respirators; it is also useful in assessing
work practices and compliance with safety procedures.
Designing a Monitoring Program
A comprehensive medical monitoring program for
potential exposure to organophosphate pesticides would
include physical examinations, air sampling, measurement
of post-exposure urinary alkylphosphates, and
determination of acetylcholinesterase levels. However,
such a comprehensive program may be too expensive or
otherwise impractical for many companies. Therefore,
medical monitoring should adhere to the following
recommended hierarchy:
- first priority is to monitor plasma and RBC
cholinesterase levels;
- next priority is to monitor urinary alkylphosphate
levels;
- third priority is to perform environmental
sampling;
- physical examinations are the final step in the
standard comprehensive monitoring program.
Monitoring Cholinesterase
Measurement of the pesticide itself in blood is not
useful for monitoring because of the rapid metabolism of
the pesticide. Organophosphates are hydrolyzed by the
liver within minutes to hours of exposure. Instead,
measurement of cholinesterase activity in blood is the
established procedure for monitoring organophosphate
exposure. Although there is a wide range of
cholinesterase levels in a population, each individual
maintains a relatively stable level of cholinesterase
activity in blood unless there are interfering factors
to upset that stable level. There are several different
laboratory methods available to measure cholinesterase
activity in blood, and different units of measurement
are utilized by different laboratories. Whatever
laboratory you use, I strongly recommend that you verify
that all determinations are made using the same units of
measurement.
Following exposure, the cholinesterase level in an
individual’s blood decreases. In order to detect that
decrease in cholinesterase activity, it is necessary to
have a baseline, pre-exposure determination of
cholinesterase activity. Several medical conditions may
cause depression of cholinesterase activity, including
infectious hepatitis, chronic gastritis, chronic
pneumonitis, malnourishment, gastric carcinoma, and
renal cancers. Cholinesterase can also be depressed by
exposure to carbamate pesticides. RBC (erythrocyte)
cholinesterase is considered the more accurate
reflection of the degree of synaptic cholinesterase
inhibition. Plasma pseudocholinesterase determinations,
however, are easier to obtain. Both RBC and Plasma
cholinesterase need to be assessed. The two tests have
different meanings and must be evaluated together to
assess an individual’s exposure. Plasma cholinesterase
is more labile than RBC cholinesterase, but it recovers
much more quickly since it is manufactured in the liver.
RBC cholinesterase is a better indicator of acute
depression, but it recovers slowly. RBC cholinesterase
recovers as new red blood cells are regenerated at a
rate of about 1% per day. It is recommended that
baseline cholinesterase levels be measured in duplicate
by the same laboratory. If the two determinations differ
by 15% or more, then a third determination needs to be
made. Blood samples drawn for cholinesterase
determination should be ICED. An un-iced specimen is
prone to loss of activity while in transit to the
laboratory. Category I pesticides are those with an oral
toxicity of < 50 mg/kg in laboratory animals and
Category II pesticides are those with an oral toxicity
of < 500 mg/kg. Employees working with category I or II
organophosphate pesticides should undergo a baseline
cholinesterase activity determination followed by a
first monitoring test not more than three days after
working with the pesticide for seven days. Additional
monitoring for new employees should occur every 30 days.
After an employee has three monitoring tests, the
frequency may be reduced to every 60 days unless medical
evaluation indicates a more frequent test interval is
appropriate.
[top]
Monitoring Urinary Alkylphosphates
Measurement of alkylphosphate metabolites in urine is
perhaps the most sensitive measurement of
organophosphate exposure. The most common metabolites
found in urine are diethylphosphate (DEP),
diethylphosphorothioate (DETP),
diethylphos-phorodithioate (DEDTP), dimethylphosphate (DMP),
dimethylphosphorothioate (DMTP), and
dimethylphos-phorodithioate (DMDTP). These metabolites
are found at peak levels about three days after exposure
and they may be detected in urine up to six or seven
days after exposure. Although measuring alkylphosphate
metabolites in urine is a sensitive method of assessing
exposure, there is an innate difficulty in using this
method as the base form of monitoring because of the
sophisticated analytical method required. In some
situations this technique can be utilized with
impressive results, but it does not replace
cholinesterase monitoring.
Monitoring of Workers
Chronic exposure to organophosphate pesticides may
cause symptoms that are nonspecific and resemble
illnesses like flu, simple fatigue, or heat exhaustion.
A clinical picture of weakness, loss of appetite,
malaise, or "orange pickers’ disease" (a severe
dermatitis), is cause for evaluation of the work
environment and work practices. Small, repeated
exposures to organophosphates may gradually depress
cholinesterase activity to relatively low levels, with
little, or no, symptomatology. In general, symptoms for
acute poisoning occur after the serum cholinesterase is
depressed to 50% of normal. In mild poisoning, the
cholinesterase activity is depressed to 20–50%; in
severe poisoning, activity is 10% or less of normal.
Depression of an individual’s cholinesterase activity to
70% of baseline indicates significant exposure. If
depression of activity is 60% of baseline, the
individual must be removed from exposure and must be
monitored medically until activity levels return to 80%.
For cases of acute poisoning, treatment is started based
on clinical findings and patient history and should not
be delayed until cholinesterase determinations are
available. Continuing clinical decisions, however, need
to be based on the current cholinesterase level compared
to the individual’s baseline. Because of the need for
such information, we recommend that individuals with
potential exposure to organophosphate carry their
baseline cholinesterase level with them, and we issue a
small laminated card with the individual’s baseline
cholinesterase levels for this purpose. The card is kept
in a wallet or purse and is immediately available if
needed. This provides a solution to the ubiquitous
problem of trying to find someone’s baseline
cholinesterase levels in the company’s files or the
doctor’s office, particularly after hours, or on
weekends, etc.
Regulations for organophosphate pesticides vary from
state to state, but there is no OSHA standard, per se,
for these materials. It is important to check your own
state regulations in regard to monitoring and reporting
requirements. Perhaps the strongest regulations are
found in California, where workplace monitoring is
required if a worker’s RBC or plasma cholinesterase
falls below 80% of normal.
The growing use of organophosphate pesticides has
given rise to a growing need for biological monitoring
for workers with potential exposure to organophosphate
pesticides. Now is the time to establish medical
monitoring procedures for workplace exposures.
Happy Monitoring!
[top]
[Return to Autumn
2003 main page]
Articles in the Tracker may be printed and/or
photocopied for personal use. To reprint an article in
print or on-line media, include the following in the
reproduced copy: "This article originally appeared in
the Occupational Health Tracker, Vol.6, No.3.
Reprinted with permission of Occupational Health
Research, www.systoc.com."
|
|
|
About the
author:
Kirby Griffin,
MD, is a board-certified specialist in
Occupational Medicine and has 22 years of experience
in this field. At St. Vincent Hospital in Portland,
Oregon, Dr. Griffin was the Medical Director of
Occupational Health Services and established that
institution’s Center for Occupational Health. In 1989
he founded Northwest Occupational Health Associates.
Dr. Griffin has extensive experience in medical
surveillance and biologic monitoring. Additionally, he
has been a course instructor and speaker at numerous
seminars and national meetings and is a past president
of the Northwest Association of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine. You may reach Dr. Griffin via
e-mail: NOHAOCCMED@AOL.com.
|
Home |
Contact Information |
E-mail Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Statement
|